Endotracheal intubation, but not laryngeal mask airway insertion, produces reversible bronchoconstriction you will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. Close reduction nasal fracture is a common and well established procedure in the otolaryngology literature 1. How is intubation performed following insertion of a laryngeal mask airway lma or intubating laryngeal mask airway ilma. Key words searching from databases such as medline, embase, and. A study of airway management using the proseal lma laryngeal. The laryngeal tube also known as the king lt is an airway management device designed as an alternative to other airway management techniques such as mask ventilation, laryngeal mask airway, and tracheal intubation. Several studies suggest that placement of an endotracheal tube ett in a child with an upper respiratory infection uri increases the risk of complications. The lma provides more handsfree anesthesia than a facemask does, avoids many morbidities associated with tracheal intubation because there. The laryngeal mask airway, described below, is a newer and less invasive method of securing the airway and delivering oxygen and gas anesthesia during a general. Dec 07, 2018 endotracheal intubation eti and laryngeal mask airway lma in terms of hemodynamics and reaction were compared. Because of this, recent editions of the american heart associations guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation have deemphasized the role of tracheal intubation in favor of other airway management techniques such as bagvalve mask ventilation, the laryngeal mask airway and the combitube. Although considered a safe alternative to tracheal. Patients receiving longterm ventilation may require a tracheostomy with the breathing tube placed directly into the trachea to avoid damage to.
Some severe complications during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy pdt may be related to poor visualization of tracheal structures. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation. Basic inserton of a lma by cape town emergency medicine. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for outpatient. Endotracheal intubation is considered the standard of care but the laryngeal mask airway lma has gained acceptance as a rescue airway and has been incorporated into the obstetric airway management guidelines. A metaanalysis was performed on prospective randomised controlled trials to assess whether the laryngeal mask airway lma offered any advantage over the conventional endotracheal tube in the. With approval of the local ethics committee 52 adult patients undergoing elective anesthesia were randomly assigned to a supraglottic airway device laryngeal tube, laryngeal mask airway. The effect of endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask. Presented in part at the 50th german congress of anesthesiology, munich, april 9th to 12th, 2003. Pdf laryngeal mask airway vs endotracheal tube for. Effect of a strategy of a supraglottic airway device vs. Endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway for. How is intubation performed following insertion of a. An endotracheal tube, placed into the windpipe, has been the most widely used device for this function.
Indication for its use includes any procedure that would normally involve the use of a face mask. Many articles compared the use of the laryngeal mask airway to that of the endotracheal tube in children. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube intubation. However, during neonatal resuscitation, achieving an effective seal with a face mask may be difficult, and providers frequently have difficulty acquiring and maintaining endotracheal intubation eti skills. In this randomized controlled equivalence trial, we compared the supreme lma slma with endotracheal. Advantages, disadvantages, indications, contraindications and. Survey of the use of laryngeal mask airway vs endotracheal.
Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation. A comparative study of the effects of placement of laryngeal. A comparison of pressor responses following laryngeal mask. The laryngeal mask airway was designed as a new concept in airway management and. Subjectively, the bronchoscopical view obtained via a laryngeal mask airway lma seems to be better than that obtained with an endotracheal tube ett.
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube intubation for repairing of nasal bone fracture. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for outpatient surgery. Laryngeal mask airway lma is an alternative to intubation, which permits removal before full awakening. Application comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation in infant anaesthesia. Laryngeal tube vs laryngeal mask airway full text view. A comparison of pressor responses following laryngeal mask airway vs laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube insertion abstract objective. Placement of different laryngeal mask airways lmas under topical anaesthesia without sedation.
Comparison of the effects of endotracheal tube and laryngeal. If breathing remains depressed after using the manual resuscitation bag, a tube is placed directly into the infants large airway endotracheal intubation. Jan 28, 2012 helpful in anticipated difficult airway management safely. The endotracheal tube ett and the laryngeal mask airway. Pdf the comparison of proseal laryngeal mask airway and. Study was to evaluate and compare the use of classical laryngeal mask airway, proseal laryngeal mask airway, and endotracheal tube with controlled ventilation in patients undergoing gynecological. All articles comparing each device in children with an upper respiratory infection concluded that the laryngeal mask airway was the best choice for decreasing adverse respiratory events. Wei fu1, hong wang 2, congli zhang 1, xiaohong li1 1department of anaesthesiology, the first affiliated hospital of bengbu medical college, bengbu, pr china. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation. Postoperative complications including nausea, vomiting, coughing and sore throat were assessed in all patients during the first 24 hours. Dec 23, 2017 the goal of its development was to create an intermediate form of airway management face mask and endotracheal tube. The laryngeal mask airway lma is used as the primary airway by paramedics in singapore civil defense forces emergency ambulance service scdfs eas in the management of outofhospital cardiac arrest, because endotracheal intubation requires skilled and experienced personnel, and local paramedics are not trained to this level of skill and competency. Laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation was attempted on 52 patients.
The laryngeal mask airway was designed as a new concept in airway management and has been gaining a firm position in anesthetic. Initial laryngeal tube insertion vs endotracheal intubation. Laryngeal mask airway lma on postoperative nausea and vomiting ponv in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. A laryngeal mask is composed of an airway tube that connects to an elliptical mask with a cuff which is inserted through the patients mouth, down the windpipe, and once deployed forms an airtight seal on top the glottis unlike tracheal tubes which pass through the glottis allowing a secure airway to be managed by a health care provider. To compare the effects of placement of laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube on hemodynamic parameters in children. Laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in paediatric airway management. Laryngeal mask airway vs endotracheal tube for airway management in syringing and probing article pdf available in journal of anaesthesiology clinical pharmacology 251. Laryngeal mask airway versus bagmask ventilation or. Pdf the study was conducted to compare laryngeal mask airway.
Thames, uk is a relatively new extraglottic airway device with a modified cuff to increase the seal and a drain tube to provide a channel for regurgitated fluid, prevention of gastric insufflation and insertion of a gastric tube 7, 8. This randomized clinical trial compares the effectiveness of a strategy of initial laryngeal tube insertion vs initial endotracheal intubation performed by emergency medical services in adults with outofhospital cardiac arrest. The laryngeal mask lm is a supraglottic airway device that is inserted without. Aug 29, 2018 among adults with outofhospital cardiac arrest ohca, a strategy of initial laryngeal tube lt insertion, compared with endotracheal intubation eti, was associated with greater likelihood of 72hour survival, according to a new randomised clinical t. The effect of endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask airways on. Randomized, controlled trial comparing laryngeal mask versus. The most common adverse event reported by patients postoperatively after use of an et tube or lma is a sore throat and hoarseness.
In this randomized controlled equivalence trial, we compared the supreme lma slma with endotracheal intubation ett in managing the. One such attempt is the use of laryngeal mask airway. A total of 54 general anesthesia patients were randomized into two groups with 27 cases in each group. Pdf comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal. To test the hypothesis that laryngeal mask airway lma insertion is associated with less pressor response as compared to endotracheal intubation. To compare the effectiveness of surfactant delivery via endotracheal tube ett using an intubationsurfactantrapid extubation approach with premedication vs laryngeal mask airway lma in. The lma is shaped like a large endotracheal tube on the proximal end that connects to an elliptical mask on the distal end.
Bag and mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation may not be possible when infants have airway obstructions or head and face abnormalities that obstruct the normal flow of air into their. The development of the lma has been hailed as one of the most significant advances in airway management since the endotracheal et tube. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous. Endotracheal intubation, but not laryngeal mask airway. The laryngeal mask airway lma was introduced in 1988 in the united states. A portex disposable laryngeal mask was inserted and removed, followed by a portex endotracheal tube. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous. Jan 29, 20 basic inserton of a lma by cape town emergency medicine. However, the development of the laryngeal mask airway lma has provided anesthesiologists with an alternative means of airway management. A metaanalysis was performed on prospective randomised controlled trials to assess whether the laryngeal mask airway lma offered any advantage over the conventional endotracheal tube in the paediatric age group. Time taken from beginning of the procedure to ventilation of the patient was recorded. To investigate the impact of endotracheal tube ett vs. Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway. A metaanalysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.
The lma gained wide acceptance as an alternative to traditional tracheal tube tt intubation due to ease of insertion and a possible lower risk of trauma to the trachea. Comparative study of the ambu auraonce laryngeal mask and. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal. Comparison of supreme laryngeal mask airway versus. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in children with upper resp. Evaluation of safety and postoperative outcomes of the laryngeal mask airway lma during pediatric tonsil surgery compared to use of the endotracheal tube ett. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for. Endotracheal intubation eti and laryngeal mask airway lma in terms of hemodynamics and reaction were compared. Effectiveness of interventions to increase provider. Perfusion index versus noninvasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of igel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Endotracheal intubation eti and laryngeal mask airway lma in terms of hemodynamics. Pdf laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube in pediatric.
46 383 346 735 960 253 619 496 1344 1373 967 291 478 39 675 1229 46 1404 280 1498 407 515 743 641 231 447 884 1458 1460 270 827 8 1160 227 239 24 675